Skip to Content
Use CasesTransport & Logistics

Transport & Logistics

Moving the goods is the largest single component of trade cost — and the home of the bill of lading, a document that is both a receipt for cargo and title to it. Because it is title, the hard question is not whether it is authentic, but who controls it right now.

The story today

A carrier issues a bill of lading; a freight forwarder coordinates the shipment with a shipper’s letter of instructions; goods may rest under a warehouse receipt; cargo is covered by an insurance certificate. The original bill of lading is physically couriered around the world because whoever holds the paper holds title to the goods.

That paper-as-title model is slow and fragile:

  • Couriering originals across continents adds days and cost, and originals get lost.
  • Because control rests on possession of paper, fraud and disputes over who holds title are common.
  • The same shipment data is re-keyed across carriers, forwarders, ports, and terminals.
  • Attempts to digitise the bill of lading have mostly put it on proprietary platforms — which only work if every party joins the same one.

How it works with verifiable documents

The carrier’s system of record issues the bill of lading as a verifiable, transferable credential, signed with an identity anchored to a national register. Its control — the right to the goods — can be proven and transferred cryptographically, with no courier and no shared platform.

The carrier issues an electronic bill of lading as a transferable record anchored to the national register; control transfers provably from shipper to bank to consignee
  1. The carrier issues the electronic bill of lading as a verifiable credential — a transferable record.
  2. The shipper holds control of it, provably.
  3. Control transfers — to a financing bank, then to the consignee — as a protocol operation, not a courier shipment.
  4. The forwarder’s instructions, warehouse receipt, and insurance certificate are likewise verifiable credentials from their sources.
  5. Any party — port, terminal, bank, customs — verifies authenticity and current control independently.

Why this approach wins

Compared with putting the bill of lading on a proprietary platform or blockchain consortium:

  • More scalable — control is handled by a standardised protocol, so parties do not all need to be on the same platform. Trades are dynamic and multi-party; a platform that requires universal membership cannot keep up.
  • Higher integrity — control of the transferable record is cryptographically provable, so “who holds title” is unambiguous and disputes and double-pledging become detectable — without trusting any one platform’s ledger.
  • Cheaper to implement — no couriering of originals, no platform membership or licensing fees; the carrier and forwarder issue from the systems they already run.

The control problem — proving who holds a transferable record — is the crux, and why a protocol beats a platform. See Transferable Records and the Implementation Model.

What it’s worth

This flow realises:

  • Cost of trade — removing courier delay and cost from the largest component of trade cost, and faster cargo throughput.
  • Operational efficiency — issued once, verified everywhere, no re-keying across carriers, forwarders, and ports.
  • Trade & working-capital finance (secondary) — the electronic bill of lading and warehouse receipt become provable collateral.

The value is quantified in the business cases — most directly for the Logistics provider and Ports.

Documents & learn more

Last updated on
Trade FinanceBorder Compliance